Skip to content
Preparing for TAPA FSR

Get your facilities ready, before the auditor arrives.

Audit every facility against GFSA, our control set structured around TAPA's Facility Security Requirements. Score each site, assign the gaps to an owner, and evidence the work as it closes, months before a certification auditor walks in.

GFSA
Facility control set, Level 1
Per section
Failed and critical controls listed
Re-audit
Trend to take to certification
The readiness loop

How teams use Secuiera ahead of certification.

The same five steps, run per facility, repeated until the gaps close.

  1. 1

    Baseline

    Audit each facility against GFSA to see where you stand.

  2. 2

    See the gaps

    Failed and critical controls are listed per section, not averaged away.

  3. 3

    Assign the work

    Each gap becomes a corrective action with an owner and a due date.

  4. 4

    Evidence it

    Attach the proof to the control as remediation completes.

  5. 5

    Re-audit

    Run it again and compare. Bring the trend to your certification audit.

Where Secuiera helps

The parts of readiness that are hard.

Most teams know the standard. Far fewer can show the current state of forty sites, or prove it improved.

A consistent baseline across every site

GFSA is our facility control set, structured around TAPA FSR. Audit every site against the same weighted template so the scores are comparable, instead of each site manager assessing themselves against their own interpretation.

Same templateWeighted scoringPer-site history

Gaps you can hand to someone

A failed control becomes a finding, then a corrective action with an owner, a priority and a date. It stays visible until it is closed.

FindingsOwnersDue dates

Critical failures kept visible

Controls marked critical are reported separately from the overall percentage. A site at 85% with a critical failure is not ready, and the report says so.

Reported apart from score

Proof that it improved

Re-audit and compare. The trend across cycles, with evidence attached at each stage, is the thing that makes a readiness claim credible.

Trend over timeEvidence per control
Be clear on the boundary

Readiness assessment versus certification.

CapabilitySecuieraTAPA and its approved auditors
Internal readiness assessmentSupportedNot supported
Consistent scoring across your sitesSupportedNot supported
Gap tracking to closure with evidenceSupportedNot supported
Trend across audit cyclesSupportedNot supported
The authoritative control setNot supportedSupported
Determining your certification levelNot supportedSupported
Issuing certificationNot supportedSupported

If your goal is the certificate, you need a TAPA-approved auditor. Secuiera's job is making sure that engagement goes well.

If your standard differs

Build your own control set instead.

If your programme runs against something other than GFSA, whether a customer's requirements, an insurer's or your own, build it from the 100+-control question bank and audit against that.

See the template builder

Show us your sites

Bring your current control set and the state of your estate. We will show you how much of the readiness gap Secuiera closes.